Flashforward
…building this communal discussion forum where all men had an equal voice. Yup… some called it ‘community’, others called it ‘democracy’… what’s that? Eh? …. NO! No, no, none of us realized we were a bunch of filthy communists. It didnt’ quite click that we had been negating our property rights, by default, on almost every single site, for ten straight years. — jakoblodwick
What he described isn’t “negating” property rights, it’s called “exercising” them. Allowing public discourse can enhance property values. In fact, my fair use “reblogging” of your text promotes your ideas, giving them a wider audience (though, maybe by about 3 people in my case). Some would say that I’m adding value.
Source: jakelodwick
9 notesShowHide
-
coacervocomments reblogged this from jakelodwick and added:
Comment boxes aren’t the problem. “Any old jerk” is the problem. Yes, most YouTube and MySpace comments suck. I had a...
-
thebrianhayes reblogged this from jakelodwick and added:
Jakob is one of the smarter people involved with making the internet a much better place for everyone. Now that he has...
-
tywillis reblogged this from djnewstyle and added:
You bring up good points, and one specifically that I need to address (lest I look hypocritical). This revelation of...
-
djnewstyle reblogged this from tywillis and added:
comment on something, you’re offering your opinion relative...the content. You’re giving...
-
jakelodwick reblogged this from themarkpike and added:
themarkpike, after reading my earlier post on property, said, Jakob needs to add “property law” to his list of...
-
msg reblogged this from jakelodwick and added:
years.— [future] jakoblodwick—- but how else do we make money on the backs of others ;) ?
-
themarkpike reblogged this from jakelodwick and added:
What he described isn’t “negating” property rights, it’s...“exercising” them. Allowing...
-
jakelodwick posted this
